💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.
We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.
It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!

A coalition of Jewish, Hindu and Zoroastrian parents has initiated legal action against Palo Alto Unified School District and high school principal Brent Kline regarding a mosque visit organized during the 2025 school year. The August 7 lawsuit centers on student participation in religious activities as part of the institution’s Social Justice Pathway curriculum, with plaintiffs asserting that minors engaged in practices without explicit parental authorization.
According to court documents, students touring the Muslim Community Association facility received Islamic religious garments and were encouraged to wear them on-site. The complaint further alleges that attendees were given Qurans, observed Dhuhr prayer sessions, and participated with members of the Noor Hifz Academy, a religious youth program focused on Quranic memorization.
The legal filing specifically identifies Zahra Billoo, executive director of the Bay Area Council on American-Islamic Relations office, as a participant in the field trip. Billoo has previously faced scrutiny over remarks characterized as antisemitic by critics.
Attorney David Rosenberg-Wohl, representing the plaintiffs, stated that the core grievance involves a public institution promoting a specific faith tradition. He contended that curriculum design suggesting Islam aligns with progressive social justice values violates the constitutional separation of church and state.
The Muslim Community Association defended its educational mission, asserting that student exposure to Islamic practices serves to counter religious misunderstanding and bigotry rather than constitute coercion.
Palo Alto Unified Superintendent Jason Glass acknowledged his office is examining the allegations but declined further remarks pending litigation resolution. Student newspaper editor Juni Thurston disputed contentions that female participants were compelled to wear hijabs or subjected to religious indoctrination.
Constitutional law experts raised First Amendment concerns about mandatory religious dress requirements in school-sponsored activities. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression Vice President Adam Goldstein noted that compelling students to wear religious attire parallels prohibited compelled speech doctrines established in prior Supreme Court decisions.
More Stories
Federal voting arrest in New Jersey adds new pressure point in Sherrill-Trump standoff
Colombia backs Trump security push while limiting U.S. role in anti-gang operations
Former NFL cheerleader and ex-aide face off in close Rhode Island GOP primary