💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.
We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.
It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!

With midterm elections looming, the Democratic Party is attempting to reframe public safety as a central voting issue while simultaneously distancing itself from prior calls to defund police departments. The strategy faces considerable headwinds as candidates who previously supported reallocating law enforcement budgets now confront their earlier positions, creating vulnerability on an issue where Democrats traditionally held advantage.
Democratic strategist Antjuan Seawright warned that fringe positions favoring police defunding cost the party seats in 2020 and allowed Republicans to seize the narrative on crime. “It was a serious debate in 2020 that arguably cost us some seats that year and caused us to lose on something where we should have had the upper ground, because a few members of our party wanted to have a stylistic debate rather than one on substance,” Seawright said. He emphasized that Democrats must control the conversation before opponents weaponize their past statements against them.
In Wisconsin, State Rep. Francesca Hong, a democratic socialist candidate for governor, previously declared in 2020 social media posts that she supported “defunding the police as a first step towards abolishing the police” and stated that “police exist to uphold white supremacy.” However, as a gubernatorial candidate, Hong significantly softened her rhetoric, stating during an Aug. 11 primary debate that she opposed cutting police funding and prioritized public safety initiatives.
Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed deleted numerous social media posts supporting police defunding, according to a November CNN report, and now rejects the concept entirely. Similarly, New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani apologized for 2020 posts describing the police department as “racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety” while calling to defund it, later retaining his predecessor’s police commissioner to mollify concerns.
In Memphis, Tennessee, the political debate over crime and policing carries direct consequences for residents. State Sen. London Lamar, who represents the city, noted that President Trump deployed National Guard troops as part of an anti-crime initiative, with federal agents killing two individuals during operations this month. Despite frustration with federal intervention, Lamar indicated that most Memphis residents remain skeptical of defunding police, viewing the national debate as a distraction from substantive public safety solutions.
More Stories
Federal voting arrest in New Jersey adds new pressure point in Sherrill-Trump standoff
Colombia backs Trump security push while limiting U.S. role in anti-gang operations
Former NFL cheerleader and ex-aide face off in close Rhode Island GOP primary