Vanity Fair Ends Journalist’s Coverage After Courtroom Behavior During Clancy Trial

💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.

We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.

It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!

Share this story:


✉️ Email


💬 Text

Vanity Fair has severed its relationship with journalist Brittany Romano after video footage showed her smiling and winking at a camera during the Lindsay Clancy murder trial on Monday. The clip circulated widely across social media platforms, accumulating millions of views and sparking widespread discussion about courtroom conduct and journalistic professionalism.

Romano had been credentialed by the magazine specifically to cover the trial and to write a personal essay about her connection to Clancy. In a statement to Fox News, Vanity Fair said it had informed Romano and the court that she would no longer be credentialed by the publication due to conflicts with its editorial standards and processes.

Romano responded with a lengthy Instagram post defending her behavior, arguing that her facial expressions reflected a nervous response to anxiety rather than indifference to the proceedings. She emphasized that her reporting on the case for two years had focused on Clancy’s postpartum psychosis and women’s mental health issues central to the case.

Romano also addressed online harassment directed at her, stating that critics had sent her messages encouraging self-harm while claiming to advocate for Clancy’s mental health. She challenged the apparent contradiction, writing that defending one woman’s humanity while stripping another’s “would not actually protect women’s mental health.”

Share this story:


✉️ Email


💬 Text