Economic Momentum Could Stall Without Pro-Merger FTC Approach, Moore Argues

💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.

We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.

It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!

Share this story:


✉️ Email


💬 Text

The American economy is performing at peak efficiency, with the S&P 500 reaching record levels, GDP growth projected at 2.5 percent annually, and robust corporate earnings driving widespread private sector expansion. This economic performance reflects deliberate policy choices made by the Trump and Vance administration upon taking office, which prioritized restoring business confidence and reducing regulatory obstacles to growth.

The previous administration’s approach to merger oversight presented a stark contrast. Under Lina Khan’s leadership, the Federal Trade Commission blocked 43 merger deals while inflation pressured American households across food, pharmaceuticals, and essential goods. Khan characterized each blocked transaction as a strategic victory, stating that companies abandoning deals under government pressure represented regulatory success.

Andrew Ferguson’s tenure as FTC chairman has introduced a fundamentally different philosophy, emphasizing merit-based review and market realities over ideological opposition to consolidation. His stated commitment to ending what he characterized as Khan’s “war on mergers” signals a shift toward evaluating transactions based on competitive impacts rather than predetermined outcomes.

The proposed Covetrus and MWI Animal Health merger exemplifies the type of transaction that merits approval under this framework. Both companies face mounting pressure from larger competitors including Amazon and major pharmaceutical manufacturers that bypass traditional distributors. Combined operations would enable the merged entity to compete more effectively while maintaining service quality and pricing competitiveness for veterinary practices.

Ferguson has an opportunity to demonstrate that the FTC prioritizes genuine competition and consumer welfare over regulatory trophy-hunting. Approving pro-competitive mergers that enable companies to adapt to market pressures represents the proper exercise of antitrust oversight.

Share this story:


✉️ Email


💬 Text