Federal Court Halts Enforcement of New York’s Mask Ban for Immigration Agents

💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.

We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.

It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!

Share this story:


✉️ Email


💬 Text

A New York federal judge on Monday issued a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of two key provisions in state legislation designed to restrict the use of face coverings by federal immigration agents. U.S. District Judge Mae D’Agostino of the Northern District of New York determined that the challenged sections of the law likely violated constitutional protections and could not proceed while the legal challenge continues through the courts.

In her decision, D’Agostino found that New York’s attempt to regulate federal law enforcement operations—including those conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection—exceeded the state’s constitutional authority. The judge emphasized that only the federal government possesses the power to establish operational policies for its own law enforcement agencies.

The ruling stated that New York cannot unilaterally impose uniform requirements on federal agents based on disagreement with how federal authorities exercise their powers. Governor Kathy Hochul and Attorney General Letitia James responded by pledging to explore additional legal remedies, maintaining their position that masked federal agents undermine public safety in the state.

The court declined to block a separate provision preventing New York’s local law enforcement from participating in federal immigration enforcement through 287(g) agreements. D’Agostino noted that state and local cooperation in federal civil immigration matters remains voluntary, allowing New York to decline participation without constituting discrimination against the federal government.

Hochul and James praised that aspect of the ruling, asserting that New York residents should not bear financial responsibility for local cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The officials reiterated that state law enforcement should prioritize local matters while federal agencies handle immigration-related operations independently.

Share this story:


✉️ Email


💬 Text