💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.
We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.
It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!
Sen. Tim Sheehy, R-Mont., displayed visible emotion during a Senate floor address Thursday while opposing legislation that would restrict President Donald Trump’s military authority regarding Iran. The combat veteran and former Navy SEAL referenced a bracelet honoring a fallen colleague as he defended U.S. military operations against Tehran, transforming a Democratic-backed war powers measure into a broader debate about American security interests in the Middle East.
The Senate failed to advance the Iran War Powers Resolution in a 47-49 vote, which would have mandated the withdrawal of American forces from any hostilities with Iran absent explicit congressional authorization. Sheehy’s passionate remarks underscored Republican solidarity with the administration’s Iran stance, even as some lawmakers across both parties have questioned the long-term costs and consequences of sustained military engagement in the region.
Sheehy contended that while Democrats correctly labeled the conflict a “war of choice,” responsibility rested with Iran’s regime rather than the Trump administration. He enumerated decades of Iranian-backed attacks on Americans, including the 1983 Marine barracks bombing, the USS Cole assault, the Achille Lauro hijacking, and support for groups including Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, arguing the Iranian government initiated hostilities 47 years ago.
The senator referenced William Buckley, an American military officer abducted and killed by Iranians in 1985, as an example of the regime’s brutality. He characterized current Iranian military strikes against commercial vessels and U.S. personnel as signs of national weakness rather than strength, framing the conflict as justified defense of American lives and values.
Sheehy urged colleagues to consider deployed personnel defending American interests abroad, describing their mission as a “just war” against what he called a “murderous, savage adversary.” He concluded by arguing that unaddressed Iranian aggression for decades necessitated decisive action to prevent future generations from confronting the same threats.
More Stories
Former Indianapolis Colts Linebacker Removed by ICE for Visa Overstay and Criminal History
U.S. Military Opens Fire on Cargo Ship Attempting to Circumvent Iran Port Blockade
TPS Advocates Rally in Doral as Work Permit Deadline Approaches for Haitian Recipients