💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.
We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.
It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!
Progressive commentator Hasan Piker is not opposed to Iran having nuclear weapons, according to comments he made in an interview with Axios.”Do you think Iran should be free to build a nuclear weapon?” Axios correspondent Alex Thompson asked in a clip that aired Thursday on CNN.”I think Iran, much like any other sovereign nation, has a right to defend itself, regardless of its domestic policies,” Piker responded.RADICAL EL-SAYED ALLY DOUBLES DOWN ON ANTI-AMERICAN RHETORIC WITH STUNNING TERRORISM COMPARISONThe popular Twitch streamer went on to cite political scientist John Mearsheimer in the belief that “mutually assured destruction is the only way for countries to have sovereignty,” something he said would bring regional stability.”Now having said that, do I want Iran to have nuclear arms? No. But I also don’t want America, or Russia, or China to have a nuclear arms either,” Piker said.”Do you think the Middle East would be more stable if Iran had a nuclear weapon?” Thompson followed.”I believe yes. I think that the Middle East would be more stable,” Piker responded.ABDUL EL-SAYED DISMISSES QUESTIONS ABOUT HASAN PIKER TIES ON ‘FACE THE NATION,’ PIVOTS TO GROCERIESThe far-left personality went on to stress that he’s not “advocating” for a nuclear-armed Iran or that it should have weapons-grade enriched uranium, but he insisted that the nuclear conversation is a “distraction.””Time and time again, they have shown, the Iranian government, regardless of whether you want to trust them or not, you can just look at their actions, have proven that they are utilizing the conversation of enriched uranium as a point of leverage to bring America back to the table to get sanctions relief,” Piker said.CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST MEDIA AND CULTURE NEWSPiker began generating headlines earlier in the day when he claimed the U.S. is responsible for more terrorism than al Qaeda “pound for pound.”Democratic Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed, who campaigned alongside Piker during the primary, has repeatedly been asked about Piker’s commentary and has attempted to distance himself from his latest comments.”I do not agree with this statement [on al Qaeda], nor do I give much weight to the statements made by a social media streamer,” El-Sayed said. “I am more concerned with the dangerous policies of Donald Trump and Mike Rogers that are raising the prices of gas, groceries and healthcare for Michiganders.”
More Stories
Virginia’s attorney general says DHS may have violated state election law after whistleblower report
Miami-Dade commissioners weigh sheriff funding, transit cuts in proposed budget
Good Health Report: How expert’s plan worked to reverse bone density loss