💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.
We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.
It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!

The Massachusetts Democratic primary showdown between U.S. Sen. Ed Markey and U.S. Rep. Seth Moulton has crystallized around questions of age and technological competency, with the 80-year-old incumbent facing pressure from the 47-year-old challenger on his grasp of artificial intelligence. During a recent debate, Markey’s response about using AI platforms proved revealing when he indicated uncertainty about whether Claude or ChatGPT featured on his personal devices, stating only that he used “whatever is inside of my iPhone or my iPad — whatever comes up.”
Moulton seized on the moment to argue that generational leadership is necessary to regulate emerging technologies, calling Markey’s technological unfamiliarity “potentially disqualifying.” The congressman has made generational change the centerpiece of his campaign, contending that Markey—who would turn 86 at the conclusion of another six-year term—cannot adequately represent voters confronting challenges like artificial intelligence, housing affordability, and student debt that were nonexistent during his 50-year congressional career.
However, Markey’s younger supporters present a contrasting view, arguing that longevity in public service provides a verifiable record of consistent principles rather than a liability. They point to his 2002 opposition to creating the Department of Homeland Security and his co-authorship of the Green New Deal as evidence of progressive leadership before such positions gained mainstream Democratic support. Milan van Dam, national chair of the High School Democrats of America at age 17, characterized the generational leadership debate as rooted in ideas and consistency rather than chronological age.
Among Moulton’s younger backers, however, the argument extends beyond age to encompass policy responsiveness to modern challenges. Eighteen-year-old Molly Blander, an incoming Tufts University freshman, emphasized that her generation has grown up shaped by social media and artificial intelligence’s impact on mental health, citing Moulton’s work establishing 988 as the national suicide and crisis lifeline as an example of contemporary problem-solving that older leaders may not prioritize.
Markey countered during the debate that knowing specific AI product names mattered less than implementing effective regulatory safeguards, pointing to legislation he introduced addressing artificial intelligence’s effects on children, workers, civil rights, and the environment. The party primary is scheduled for Tuesday in the heavily Democratic state where the primary contest typically determines the general election outcome.
More Stories
Kevin Sorbo Says Goodbye to California, Credits Florida Move With Professional and Personal Growth
Republican Gubernatorial Candidate Byron Donalds Discusses Florida’s Future
Democratic Candidate Rodriguez Discusses Florida Attorney General Race