💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.
We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.
It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!

The California Senate defeated a Republican-backed amendment Tuesday that would have expanded restrictions on individuals convicted of sex crimes against children seeking public office. The measure, tied to AB 2691, failed on a party-line vote after Democratic lawmakers rejected the proposal to broaden existing disqualification provisions.
Legislation under consideration would add sexual assault and human trafficking to felony convictions that prevent Californians from running for elected positions. However, Democratic amendments narrowed the bill’s scope to apply only to Tier 3 sex-offender registry convictions, which require lifetime registration. Individuals classified as Tier 1 or Tier 2 offenders—those requiring 10 to 20 years on the registry before seeking removal—would remain eligible to seek office under the current language.
Republican state Sen. Suzette Valladares of Santa Clarita argued passionately against the restrictions, contending that convicted child predators should be categorically barred from all public positions. “Someone convicted of sexually abusing a child can still sit on your school board,” Valladares said on the Senate floor. “That’s not a loophole. That’s a choice. And in my perspective, and most, that’s wrong.”
During an earlier committee hearing, Republican state Sen. Steven Choi questioned Assemblywoman Dawn Addis, the Democratic bill author, about why certain sex offenders against minors could maintain eligibility. Addis, who championed AB 2691 as a “first in the nation” proposal, declined to address specific offenses and instead emphasized survivor protections.
Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener, who chairs the committee reviewing the legislation, argued that broader prohibitions across all three registry tiers would be excessive. He contended the sex offender registry exists as a law enforcement monitoring tool, not punishment, and cautioned against using it as a blanket proxy for disqualification from office.
Valladares told Fox News Digital she remains committed to closing what she views as a dangerous gap in California law. “I’m a mom. This one isn’t complicated for me,” she stated, noting that 10 Republicans voted in favor of her amendment while 40 senators opposed it.
More Stories
Federal voting arrest in New Jersey adds new pressure point in Sherrill-Trump standoff
Colombia backs Trump security push while limiting U.S. role in anti-gang operations
Former NFL cheerleader and ex-aide face off in close Rhode Island GOP primary