💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.
We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.
It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!

The 2028 Democratic presidential race is accelerating into public combat, with a senior communications official for California Gov. Gavin Newsom publicly challenging Pete Buttigieg’s recent campaign activity in South Carolina targeting African American voters. Izzy Gardon, Newsom’s communications director, questioned the timing and scope of Buttigieg’s efforts to build support in the crucial southern state.
Buttigieg’s representative Aida Ross posted an image on X over the weekend showing the former Transportation Secretary at an event with the Orangeburg branch of the NAACP, describing it as a successful engagement. Gardon responded with a pointed comment about the frequency of such visits, sparking an online exchange that drew immediate attention from political observers and strategists.
The confrontation highlights intensifying competition among Democratic Party figures as they position themselves for the party’s 2028 nomination contest, with South Carolina set again to hold the first official primary vote. Both the scale of Black voter engagement and southern regional support have become central battleground issues as the party grapples with questions about its connection to these constituencies.
The exchange occurred amid broader Democratic concerns about voter outreach, including criticism from Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickels that the party has “abandoned the South” and “abandoned Black voters.” South Carolina Democratic Party Chair Christale Spain countered that narrative last month, asserting the region represents the party’s future rather than its past.
Gardon later clarified to Fox News Digital that his remarks were personal observations made from his private account, not official party positions. Democratic strategists quickly reacted negatively to the public sniping, with multiple operatives warning that such early-cycle infighting risks damaging the eventual nominee and alienating key constituencies.
More Stories
Federal voting arrest in New Jersey adds new pressure point in Sherrill-Trump standoff
Colombia backs Trump security push while limiting U.S. role in anti-gang operations
Former NFL cheerleader and ex-aide face off in close Rhode Island GOP primary