💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.
We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.
It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!
Former Republican gubernatorial candidate Tudor Dixon has launched a forceful critique of Democratic Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed, arguing his political agenda poses a fundamental threat to American institutions and values. Speaking to Fox News Digital, Dixon characterized El-Sayed as someone seeking to “permanently” alter the nation’s foundational principles rather than merely implementing policy changes within a single six-year term.
Dixon centered her criticism on El-Sayed’s historical opposition to state-level bans on Sharia law, citing a 2022 speech before the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ Oklahoma chapter. During that address, El-Sayed characterized such restrictions as rooted in white supremacy and connected them to historical injustices including Native American removal and the destruction of Black Wall Street. Dixon contended this comparison reveals troubling ideological alignment and warned Michigan voters must understand El-Sayed’s position on this issue.
The GOP figure also challenged El-Sayed’s campaign appearances alongside streamer Hasan Piker, whose 10 million social media followers have watched him make controversial statements including claims that “America deserved 9/11” and remarks about Hamas and the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. Dixon criticized El-Sayed for declining to distance himself from Piker despite these provocative positions.
El-Sayed previously defended the association during an April appearance on “Fox & Friends,” stating that appearing alongside someone does not imply agreement on all matters. Dixon dismissed this explanation, arguing voters cannot overlook such connections given their broader implications.
Dixon extended her concerns to El-Sayed’s economic platform, characterizing it as exceeding socialism by advocating government control over personal prosperity. She referenced El-Sayed’s 2007 University of Michigan commencement speech, when he spoke alongside former President Bill Clinton about changing the world, suggesting his actual intent involves dismantling American structures.
The race pits El-Sayed against Republican nominee Mike Rogers for the seat vacated by retiring Democratic Senator Gary Peters. Dixon suggested some Democrats opposed to El-Sayed in the primary may support him through straight-ticket voting, while others could cross over to back Rogers, creating an unpredictable electoral dynamic.
More Stories
Jobless Claims Fall to 206,000 as U.S. Layoffs Remain Historically Restrained
Federal Court Rules in Favor of Trump and GOP on Redistricting Ahead of Midterm Elections
U.S. Army Uses Video Game Access as Recruitment Tool for Soldier Retention