💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.
We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.
It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!

A former federal prosecutor in Miami is challenging his termination by the Justice Department, contending that his firing violated his constitutional right to free speech. Will Rosenzweig was dismissed last September after a conservative political commentator amplified years-old blog posts in which he had criticized President Donald Trump, according to a lawsuit filed Friday in federal court in Miami.
Rosenzweig was just two weeks away from prosecuting a multimillion-dollar Medicare fraud case when his blog, which had been inactive for more than six years, was highlighted online by commentator Natalie Winters. Within three hours of her post featuring his thoughts on Trump alongside a screenshot of his LinkedIn profile tagged to senior Justice Department leadership, Rosenzweig received a termination email signed by then-Attorney General Pam Bondi, the complaint states.
The dismissal occurred while Rosenzweig was traveling with his family for Rosh Hashana, the Jewish holiday. His lawsuit seeks reinstatement and a judicial declaration that his firing was unlawful, describing him as a highly respected prosecutor who had received consistent praise and was promised a reserved parking spot just weeks before his termination.
The complaint characterizes the firing as part of a broader purge at the Justice Department targeting prosecutors involved in investigations related to Trump. Rosenzweig’s blog covered travel, sports and various apolitical topics alongside his political commentary, yet the commentator selectively highlighted only his Trump-related observations, the lawsuit notes.
The case argues that conditioning federal employment on political silence would create a system where merit becomes secondary to party loyalty. A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment on the pending litigation.
More Stories
Duke Law School Faces Federal Scrutiny Over Admissions Practices Following Supreme Court Decision
San Francisco Father Questioned by Park Rangers While Teaching His Own Children Tennis
Chicago Sky Prepares for Cunningham Support Rally Ahead of Fever Matchup