💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.
We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.
It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has announced plans to impose civil penalties exceeding $470,000 against a New York-based immigration attorney accused of submitting fraudulent documents to support asylum applications. Homeland Security Investigations issued a Notice of Intent to Fine to attorney Suraj Raj Singh, whose practice primarily serves Indian nationals pursuing asylum claims in immigration courts across the country.
Federal authorities allege that Singh prepared and filed 118 fraudulent documents spanning 54 separate immigration cases. The proposed penalty of $470,584 represents the maximum allowable fine under applicable law. According to the Department of Homeland Security, asylum declarations filed on behalf of Singh’s clients contained language and factual narratives that were “identical or nearly identical,” sharing substantially similar accounts of alleged persecution.
The Trump administration has intensified scrutiny of alleged asylum fraud within the immigration system. DHS General Counsel James Percival stated that fraudulent asylum claims threaten national security and impede removal proceedings for criminal aliens, adding that the department intends to hold attorneys accountable for abusing the immigration system.
The Singh case represents the second instance in which DHS has pursued civil penalties against an immigration attorney under federal statute 8 U.S.C. § 1324c(d). Last month, authorities issued five separate Notices of Intent to Fine against attorney Vinod Doddamani, seeking combined penalties of $255,232 over similar document fraud allegations.
A Notice of Intent to Fine provides the recipient an opportunity to respond before penalties become final. Singh has not yet responded to requests for comment regarding the enforcement action.
More Stories
Jupiter Retiree Lost $700,000 in ‘Pig Butchering’ Romance Scam
Water Search Underway After Children Reported Missing in New Jersey’s Passaic River
Rogan Cautions Against Liberal Migration to Texas, Says Political Shifts Could Destabilize State