💛 A quick favor, if you've got a second.
We're really happy that you chose to read one of our stories and sincerely hope you'll stick around to read more. We took our paywall down — for now — but that won't last forever, and when the gate goes back up, we'd love for you to already be on the inside.
It's free. So please enter your email here and don't forget to like and follow us on all of your favorite Social Media platforms!

The judge overseeing prosecutions related to the death of LSU student Madison Brooks has drawn scrutiny after court documents revealed her son is a registered sex offender with multiple rape convictions. Judge Gail Ray is presiding over the cases against three men accused of gang-raping Brooks, a 19-year-old student who was killed by a vehicle in 2023 following the alleged assault.
Court records obtained by Fox News Digital indicate that Ray’s son, 46-year-old Nelson Taylor, was convicted of multiple counts of forcible rape in 1997 for assaults committed between October 1995 and April 1996 against high school classmates. Taylor is currently challenging those convictions, a legal battle that has created complications within the 19th Judicial District Court given his mother’s judicial position.
Desmond Carter, 21, is scheduled to proceed to trial on August 17 as the first of three defendants to face a jury in connection with Brooks’ death. The second defendant, Casen Carver, is charged with video voyeurism, first-degree rape and third-degree rape, with his trial set for November.
District Attorney Hillar Moore filed a motion in November 2025 seeking Ray’s recusal from Carver’s case, citing a series of text messages between the defendant and his father. In those communications, Carver allegedly stated the judge was “on our side” and claimed familiarity with Ray that would influence her rulings favorably toward the defense.
Moore’s office also referenced Ray’s prior evidentiary rulings that favored the defense, including orders requiring the state to produce cellular data and items from Carver’s phone. The prosecutor argued these patterns, combined with the suspect’s apparent belief in judicial bias, created legitimate grounds for recusal.
Judge Bradley Myers, who evaluated the recusal motion, noted that Carver’s statements were “affirmative statements” demonstrating confidence the judge would rule in the defendant’s favor based on her son’s criminal history and alleged connections. All judges in the district had recused themselves from Taylor’s appeal motion filed in November 2025, delaying proceedings until late July.
The Louisiana Supreme Court ultimately reversed an initial recusal decision and allowed Ray to preside over Carver’s case. Legal experts noted that Louisiana’s recusal standard requires demonstrating actual bias or personal interest, and friendship alone between a judge and parties does not necessarily establish grounds for removal.
More Stories
New York City Deploys Enhanced Security for Manhattan Dominican Day Parade Following Recent Arrests
Second Victim Found in Bronx Apartment Building Following Explosion and Fire
Jill Biden Expresses Doubt About Female U.S. President in Her Lifetime